Harry Moffat
34ff876182
Rebaselined the problem. The solution changed in the 4th sig digit,
...
because, I think, the physical constants changed in ct_defs.h
2003-08-21 22:25:13 +00:00
Harry Moffat
c04c3087f7
Rebaselined test, because the answer changed in the 4th digit. I think
...
it is due to the change in physical constants in ct_defs.h
2003-08-21 22:23:55 +00:00
Harry Moffat
10f64c1650
Rebaselined after adding in a reaction
2003-08-21 15:35:14 +00:00
Harry Moffat
89a7522ad6
Added a new test problem
2003-08-20 19:36:43 +00:00
Harry Moffat
ed7949cd4a
Updated the xml data file
2003-08-07 21:49:25 +00:00
Harry Moffat
3a48ca5e5f
Added the Makefile.in input file
2003-08-07 00:23:21 +00:00
Harry Moffat
d46d6d15ac
Rebaselined these three tests. The results had changed in the
...
3rd significant digit.
The changes, according to Goodwin, were most likely due to the change
in the method of inclusion of the activation energies. Basically,
a non standard kcal/mole conversion method was used to convert
activation energies to temperatures internally.
2003-08-07 00:22:11 +00:00
Harry Moffat
7f16539c86
Updated xml files
2003-08-06 18:30:27 +00:00
Harry Moffat
2158086053
Added a simple test that calculate a rate of production for a surface
...
mechanism
2003-08-06 17:32:02 +00:00
Harry Moffat
ce4d299371
updated xml file. test passes.
2003-08-06 17:10:35 +00:00
Harry Moffat
97d3438d33
Added a file to the ignore list, created during the test
2003-06-10 16:32:59 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
2a00814a9d
*** empty log message ***
2003-06-07 23:53:49 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
d9c72ffafd
*** empty log message ***
2003-04-20 14:44:59 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
732bed5332
*** empty log message ***
2003-04-20 13:21:49 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
323310bffd
*** empty log message ***
2003-04-20 04:59:05 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
e93289bcef
*** empty log message ***
2003-04-18 23:20:16 +00:00
Dave Goodwin
1e8d3822ff
Initial revision
2003-04-14 17:57:48 +00:00
