[Doc] Describe governing equations for 1D flames
This commit is contained in:
parent
a01032cd2d
commit
530d503848
2 changed files with 130 additions and 0 deletions
129
doc/sphinx/flames.rst
Normal file
129
doc/sphinx/flames.rst
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
|
|||
.. default-role:: math
|
||||
|
||||
.. py:currentmodule:: cantera
|
||||
|
||||
**********************
|
||||
One-Dimensional Flames
|
||||
**********************
|
||||
|
||||
Cantera includes a set of models for representing steady-state, quasi-one-
|
||||
dimensional reacting flows, which can be used to simulate a number of common
|
||||
flames, such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- freely-propagating premixed laminar flames
|
||||
- burner-stabilized premixed flames
|
||||
- counterflow diffusion flames
|
||||
- counterflow (strained) premixed flames
|
||||
|
||||
Additional capabilities include simulation of surface reactions, which can be
|
||||
used to represent processes such as combustion on a catalytic surface or
|
||||
chemical vapor deposition processes.
|
||||
|
||||
All of these configurations are simulated using a common set of governing
|
||||
equations within a 1D "flow" domain, with the differences between the models
|
||||
being represented by differences in the boundary conditions applied. Here, we
|
||||
describe the governing equations and the various boundary conditions which can
|
||||
be applied.
|
||||
|
||||
Stagnation Flow Governing Equations
|
||||
===================================
|
||||
|
||||
Cantera models flames which are stabilized in an axisymmetric stagnation flow,
|
||||
and computes the solution along the stagnation streamline (`r=0`), using a
|
||||
similarity solution to reduce the three-dimensional governing equations to a
|
||||
single dimension.
|
||||
|
||||
The governing equations for a steady axisymmetric stagnation flow follow those
|
||||
derived in Section 6.2 of [KCG2003]_:
|
||||
|
||||
*Continuity*:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{\partial\rho u}{\partial z} + 2 \rho V = 0
|
||||
|
||||
*Radial momentum*:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\rho u \frac{\partial V}{\partial z} + \rho V^2 =
|
||||
- \Lambda
|
||||
+ \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(\mu \frac{\partial V}{\partial z}\right)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*Energy*:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\rho c_p u \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} =
|
||||
\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(\lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)
|
||||
- \sum_k j_k c_{p,k} \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}
|
||||
- \sum_k h_k W_k \dot{\omega}_k
|
||||
|
||||
*Species*:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\rho u \frac{\partial Y_k}{\partial z} = - \frac{\partial j_k}{\partial z}
|
||||
+ W_k \dot{\omega}_k
|
||||
|
||||
where `\rho` is the density, `u` is the axial velocity, `v` is the radial
|
||||
velocity, `V = v/r` is the scaled radial velocity, `\Lambda` is the pressure
|
||||
eigenvalue (independent of `z`), `\mu` is the dynamic viscosity, `c_p` is the
|
||||
heat capacity at constant pressure, `T` is the temperature, `\lambda` is the
|
||||
thermal conductivity, `Y_k` is the mass fraction of species `k`, `j_k` is the
|
||||
diffusive mass flux of species `k`, `c_{p,k}` is the specific heat capacity of
|
||||
species `k`, `h_k` is the enthalpy of species `k`, `W_k` is the molecular weight
|
||||
of species `k`, and `\dot{\omega}_k` is the molar production rate of species
|
||||
`k`.
|
||||
|
||||
The tangential velocity `w` has been assumed to be zero, and the fluid has been
|
||||
assumed to behave as an ideal gas.
|
||||
|
||||
To help in the solution of the discretized problem, it is convenient to write a
|
||||
differential equation for the scalar `\Lambda`:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\Lambda}{\dz} = 0
|
||||
|
||||
Diffusive Fluxes
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
The species diffusive mass fluxes `j_k` are computed according to either a
|
||||
mixture-averaged or multicomponent formulation. If the mixture-averaged
|
||||
formulation is used, the calculation performed is:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
j_k^* = \rho \frac{W_k}{\bar{W}} D_{k,m} \frac{\partial X_k}{\partial z}
|
||||
|
||||
j_k = j_k^* - Y_k \sum_i j_i^*
|
||||
|
||||
where `\bar{W}` is the mean molecular weight of the mixture, `D_{k,m}` is the
|
||||
mixture-averaged diffusion coefficient for species `k`, and `X_k` is the mole
|
||||
fraction for species `k`. The diffusion coefficients used here are those
|
||||
computed by the method :ct:`GasTransport::getMixDiffCoeffs`. The correction
|
||||
applied by the second equation ensures that the sum of the mass fluxes is zero,
|
||||
a condition which is not inherently guaranteed by the mixture-averaged
|
||||
formulation.
|
||||
|
||||
When using the multicomponent formulation, the mass fluxes are computed
|
||||
according to:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
j_k = \frac{\rho W_k}{\bar{W}^2} \sum_i W_i D_{ki} \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial z}
|
||||
- \frac{D_k^T}{T} \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}
|
||||
|
||||
where `D_{ki}` is the multicomponent diffusion coefficient and `D_k^T` is the
|
||||
Soret diffusion coefficient (used only if calculation of this term is
|
||||
specifically enabled).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
.. [KCG2003] Kee, Coltrin, Glarborg: *Chemically Reacting Flow*.
|
||||
Wiley-Interscience, 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Documentation
|
|||
language-interfaces
|
||||
cti/index
|
||||
reactors
|
||||
flames
|
||||
cython/index
|
||||
matlab/index
|
||||
cxx-guide/index
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue